28 Mai 2010 midis Training personnels Education étudiants Dialogue public www.nanosmile.org Yves SICARD Conseiller scientifique CEA LITEN DTNM Laboratoire de Chimie et Sécurité des Nanotechnologies Maitre de Conférences UJF POLYTECH Dpt prévention des Risques Industriels Pourquoi? Dire quoi, à qui? Comment? Quelques exemples Un Cartoon! 1
midis Remerciements GT nano CEA CARTOONS Rénovation site: Olivier Parent 2
Historique midis Veille mise à jour Conception implémentation Expression du besoin Nouvelles ressources Version Intranet Juil. Déc 07 Juin06 Version Internet Audits Nouvelle Version web Entre 110.00 et 20.00 requêtes/mois Mars Av. Formations Tests Juin08 Juin09 Juin2010 FORMATION INSTN MAITRISE DES RISQUES NANO GT nano CEA 3
Pourquoi? Des applications déjà sur le marché et beaucoup d espoir de développement 4
Pourquoi? Grande diversité des secteurs concernés VIE QUOTIDIENNE INFORMATION ENERGIE ENVIRONNEMENT SANTE 5
Pourquoi?...une aiguille dans une botte de foin Nanoparticule...naturelle.de combustion Nano objets...manufacturés Un bruit de fond important ET variable 6
Pourquoi? Quelle précaution pour quel niveau de risque? DANGER RISQUE = f(danger * EXPOSITION) Aussi faible que possible =? * ~0 Principe de précaution Innovation Responsable = Limiter le RISQUE + Faire des recherches Risque Imposé? / ~Choisi? / Subi ou Volontaire? Cible Travailleur / Consommateur / Citoyen EXPOSITION 7
Démarche Gestion intégrée d un risque émergeant EMERGING RISK GOVERNANCE? Hazard, exposure, LCA research Standards, regulations, ISO, CEN, Socio-economic analysis: benefit/risk Precaution, Training, Best practices Risk communication, societal dialogue WORKERS CONSUMERS CITIZENS Occupational Environmental Health, Ethics issues i c S ce n e NANO FP6/7 e REGULATION s i rt e p TRADE union x E ng INDUSTRY i in a Tr OHS* n o i INSTITUTION at c u d E e PUBLIC,E&C NGOs** u og l a Di * Occupational Health & Safety **Environmental & Consumers Non Governmental Organization 8
Why, to whom, saying what and how?? Hazard, exposure, LCA research NANO FP6/7 REGULATION TRADE union INDUSTRY OHS* INSTITUTION PUBLIC,E&C NGOs** 9
Why, to whom, saying what and how? TC 229 Standards, regulations, ISO, CEN, Socio-economic analysis: benefit/risk COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 07/02/2008 on a code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research NANO FP6/7 REGULATION TRADE union INDUSTRY OHS* INSTITUTION PUBLIC,E&C NGOs** S EA 10
Why, to whom, saying what and how? NANO FP6/7 CS N 53 Precaution, Training, Best practices REGULATION TRADE union INDUSTRY OHS* INSTITUTION References [1] Maynard, A. D. et al. Nature 444, 267 269 (2006). [2] National Research Council Review of the Federal Strategy for Nanotechnology-Related Environmental, Health, and Safety Research (National Academies Press, 2009). E&C [3] Hansen, S. F., Maynard, A., Baun, A. & Tickner, J. A. Nature Nanotech. 3, 444 447 (2008). [4] Murashov, V. & Howard, J. Nature Nanotech. 4, 205 206 (2009). [5] http://www.goodnanoguide.org/tiki-index.php?page=homepage [6] Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly-Identified HealthRisks The Appropriateness of the Risk Assessment Methodology in Accordance with the Technical Guidance Documents for New and Existing Substances for Assessing the Risks of Nanomaterials (European Commission, 2007). [7] National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology (NIOSH, 2009). [8] International Organization for Standardization Nanotechnologies Health and Safety Practices in Occupational Settings Relevant to Nanotechnologies (ISO Technical Report 12885, 2008). PUBLIC, NGOs** 11
Why, to whom, saying what and how? References [1] Mateo Bonazzi, European Commission, Communicating nanotechnology, (March 2010) [2] David Berube, White paper, Communicating risk in the 21st century, NNCO, (Feb 2010) [3] Chris.Tourney, Nature Nanotechnology, Vol 4, (March 2009) [4] Dan Kahan & David Rejeski, Project emerging on nanotechnologies (March 2009) [5] R. Sandler, Nantechnology, social & Ethical issues, Woodroiw Wilson Center, (Jan 2009) [6] M. Siegrist & al, Correspondence Nature Nanotechnology (Feb 2007) [7] N. Piedgeon & al, Letters Nature Nanotechnology (Feb 2007) [8] Commission Recommendation, Code of Conducts, (Feb 2008) NANO FP6/7 NANO FORUM Risk communication, societal dialogue WORKERS CONSUMERS CITIZENS Occupational Environmental Health, Ethics issues REGULATION TRADE union INDUSTRY OHS* INSTITUTION PUBLIC,E&C NGOs** 12
Dire quoi, à qui et comment? Tous citoyens, consommateurs et.? EMERGING RISK GOVERNANCE Hazard, exposure, LCA research Standards, regulations, ISO, CEN, Socio-economic analysis: benefit/risk Precaution, Training, Best practices Risk communication, societal dialogue WORKERS CONSUMERS CITIZENS Occupational Environmental Health, Ethics issues i c S ce n e NANO FP6/7 e REGULATION s i rt e p TRADE union x E ng INDUSTRY i in a Tr OHS* n o i INSTITUTION at c u d E e PUBLIC,E&C NGOs** u og l a Di Rendre accessible sans trahir la complexité Etre attractif, rigoureux, neutre et «à jour» 13
Why, to whom, saying what and how? General public Environt & Consumer NGOs P rec a utio ns Students Scientists Technologs M etro lo g y H ea lth E nviro nm ent D ia lo g ue G uideline Workers OHS Managers Trade union Industry Regulators SMEs Economics Politics Show invisible & complex things, Facilitate understanding Animations Videos Cartoons Quiz http://www.nanosmile.org Make science sexy, attractive Be neutral, reliable & updated Nanosafety information reference 14
28 Mai 2010 midis.. Visite guidée du site + Un Cartoon! 15
28 Mai 2010 midis Des questions? 16