Construire son projet :

Construire son projet : Rédiger la Mise en œuvre (3/4) Service Europe Direction des Programmes et de la Formation pour le Sud

Sommaire Construire son projet : Rédiger les parties mise en œuvre, Membres du consortium et questions éthiques (3/4) Structuration du projet en work packages Définition des tâches, livrables et jalons Diagrammes de PERT et de Gantt Gouvernance et ressources Description des partenaires Parties éthiques et sécurité

Contenu de la Part B 1- Excellence 1.1 Objectives 1.2 Relation To The Work Programme 1.3 Concept And Approach 1.4 Ambition 2 Impact 2.1 Expected Impacts 2.2 Measures To Maximise Impact 3 Implementation 3.1 Work Plan Work Packages, Deliverables And Milestones 3.2 Management Structure And Procedures 3.3 Consortium As A Whole 3.4 Resources To Be Committed 4 Members of the consortium 5 Ethics and security

3.1 Work plan Work packages, deliverables and milestones Please provide the following: brief presentation of the overall structure of the work plan timing of the different work packages and their components (Gantt chart or similar) detailed work description, i.e.: a description of each work package (table 3.1a) a list of work packages (table 3.1b); a list of major deliverables (table 3.1c); graphical presentation of the components showing how they inter-relate (Pert chart or similar)

Quelques définitions utiles Milestone: go/no go decision. A moment when an objective is attained with success and a decision is needed to go further with the next phase of the project. Success indicators required. Example: field survey complete and data quality validated Work Package: Research activities are broken down into WP which depend to each other. Each WP has tangible objectives to attain, a programme of tasks and expected results. Task: the work to be done in each WP Deliverable: WP results (usually reports)

Le diagramme de Gantt Objectif : Présenter le déroulement du projet dans le temps et la pertinence des milestones WP / Task WP1 1.1 1.2 1.3 WP2 2.1 2.2 Description First year Second Year Third year Fourth year M1 M3 M4 M6 M7 M9 M10 M12 M13 M15 M16 M18 M19 M21 M22 M24 M25 M27 M28 M30 M31 M33 M34 M36 M37 M39 M40 M42 M43 M45 M46 M48 M M M M WP3 M M M M 3.1 3.2 WP4 4.1 4.2 WP5 5.1 5.2 5.3 M M M M Meeting or workshop M Milestone 6

Le diagramme de PERT Objectif : Montrer les interactions entre les work packages 7

Liste des Work Package Work package No Work Package Title Lead Participant No Lead Participant Short Name Person- Months Start Month End month Total months Service Europe 8

WP Description Présentation des work packages (objectifs, taches, deliverables) Work package number WP6 Start date or starting event: Month 12 Work package title Migration trends Participant number 1 2 3 4 5 Participant short name IRD GIGA CDE CRES UCAD Person-months per participant 8 5 12 7 6 Objectives : Description of work (broken down into tasks) and role of participants: Task 6.1 Task 6.2 Task 6.3 Deliverables (brief description and month of delivery) D6.1 D6.2 D6.3 9

Liste des délivrables Deliverable (number) Deliverable name Work package number Short name of lead participant Type Dissemination level Delivery date Service Europe 10

3.2 Management structure and procedures Describe the organisational structure and the decision-making ; Explain why the organisational structure and decision-making mechanisms are appropriate to the complexity and scale of the project; Describe, where relevant, how effective innovation management will be addressed in the management structure and work plan; Innovation management is a process which requires an understanding of both market and technical problems, with a goal of successfully implementing appropriate creative ideas. A new or improved product, service or process is its typical output. It also allows a consortium to respond to an external or internal opportunity. Describe any critical risks, relating to project implementation, that the stated project s objectives may not be achieved. Detail any risk mitigation measures. Please provide a table with critical risks identified and mitigating actions (table 3.2b).

Structure de management 12

Liste des milestones 13

Tous les risques doivent être mentionnés 14

Et proposer des mesures correctives 15

3.3 Consortium as a whole Describe how the participants collectively constitute a consortium capable of achieving the project objectives, and how they are suited and are committed to the tasks assigned to them. Show the complementarity between participants. Explain how the composition of the consortium is well-balanced in relation to the objectives of the project (=Show that the consortium is sufficient to reach the aims of the project.) If appropriate describe the industrial involvement to ensure exploitation of the results, and how the opportunity of involving SMEs has been taken into account Subcontracting: If any part of the work is to be subcontracted describe the work involved and explain why a subcontract approach has been chosen for it. Other countries: If a participants requesting EU funding is based outside the EU, and is not an Associated country or an International Cooperation Partner Countries, explain why such funding would be essential

3.3 Consortium as a whole : conseil d écriture Eviter de présenter un résumé des «lettres de noblesse» de chaque partenaire. Décrire la dimension européenne et internationale du projet Décrire l utilité du background de chaque partenaire vis-à-vis des objectifs du projet Décrire les compétences de chaque partenaire utiles à l atteinte des impacts

3.3 Consortium as a whole : exercice

3.4 Resources to be committed Describe how the totality of the necessary resources will be mobilised, including any resources that will complement the EC contribution. Show how the resources will be integrated in a coherent way, and show how the overall plan for the project is adequate. In addition to the costs indicated in Part A, please indicate any other major costs (e.g. equipment). Ensure that the figures stated in part B are consistent with those in Part A. Please provide the following: a table showing number of person/months required (table 3.4a); a table showing other direct costs (table 3.4b) for participants where those costs exceed 15% of the personnel costs (according to the table in section 3 of the administrative proposal forms).

Proposition de structure de la part 3.4 (1) A. Une brève présentation du budget général : répartition entre les partenaires, entre les Work Package et entre les types de coûts

Proposition de structure de la part 3.4 (2) B Le tableau des efforts en personne/mois WP1 WP2 WP3 Total Person/ Months per Participant Participant Number/Short Name Participant Number/Short Name Participant Number/Short Name Total Person/Months

Proposition de structure de la part 3.4 (2) B Le tableau des efforts en personne/mois

Proposition de structure de la part 3.4 (3) C Le tableau* de justification des Other direct cost (travel, equipment, infrastructure, goods and services, large research infrastructure) * Tableau obligatoire si total des autres coûts directs dépasse 15% des coûts de personnels du partenaire

Justification du budget Montrer que le budget est en accord avec les activités prévues Aucun partenaire ne devrait : Avoir plus de 50% du budget total Concentrer plus de 50% des PM Pas de passager clandestin" => chaque partenaire doit être responsible d au moins une tâche dans un work package ou d un délivrable

Rôles et responsabilités Roles and responsibilities towards the Commission The beneficiaries have full responsibility for implementing the action and complying with the Agreement. The beneficiaries are jointly and severally liable for the technical implementation of the action If a beneficiary fails to implement its part of the action, the other beneficiaries become responsible for implementing this part (without being entitled to any additional EU funding for doing so), unless the [Commission][Agency] expressly relieves them of this obligation. Responsabilité collective

Section 4 Members of the consortium 4.1- Participants (applicants) Please provide, for each participant, the following (if available): a description of the legal entity and its main tasks, with an explanation of how its profile matches the tasks in the proposal. a curriculum vitae or description of the profile of the persons, including their gender, who will be primarily responsible for carrying out the proposed research and/or innovation activities; a list of up to 5 relevant publications, and/or products, services (including widely-used datasets or software), or other achievements relevant to the call content; a list of up to 5 relevant previous projects or activities, connected to the subject of this proposal; a description of any significant infrastructure and/or any major items of technical equipment, relevant to the proposed work; [any other supporting documents specified in the work programme for this call]

Section 4 Members of the consortium

Section 5.1 Ethics Submit an ethics self-assessment, which: describes how the proposal meets the national legal and ethical requirements of the country or countries where the tasks raising ethical issues are to be carried out explains in detail how you intend to address the issues in the ethical issues table, in particular as regards: research objectives (e.g. study of vulnerable populations, dual use, etc.) research methodology (e.g. clinical trials, involvement of children and related consent procedures, protection of any data collected, etc.) the potential impact of the research (e.g. dual use issues, environmental damage, stigmatisation of particular social groups, political or financial retaliation, benefit-sharing, malevolent use, etc.).

Section 5.1 Ethics

Auto évaluation Ethics self assessment Qui? Participants Quand? Montage du projet Quoi? Pour tous les projets Horizon 2020, dès la préparation d une proposition, il est demandé aux participants : d analyser eux-mêmes les implications éthiques des activités proposées en complétant le tableau transmis par la Commission européenne ; d'intégrer le tableau d'auto évaluation, "Ethics Issues Table", à la proposition.

Où trouver de l aide? Guide «How to complete your ethics self-assessment» Le manuel en ligne d Horizon 2020 détaille les différentes étapes de l examen éthique et recense les documents clés. Il est également possible de solliciter l Ethics Review Helpdesk http://www.horizon2020.gouv.fr/cid82023/l-ethique-dans-horizon- 2020.html

Section 5.2 Security Please indicate if your project will involve: Activities or results raising security issues: (YES/NO) 'EU-classified information' as background or results: (YES/NO)